MILES v. UNIV. OF ARK., 333 Fed.Appx. 145 (8th Cir. 2009)

  • jdjungle
Carolyn MILES, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SYSTEM, Appellee.

No. 08-2130.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.Submitted: October 6, 2009.
Filed: October 8, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Carolyn Miles, Little Rock, AR, pro se.

Sarah James, Associate General Counsel, Jeffrey Alan Bell, University of Arkansas Office of General Counsel, argued, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.

Carolyn Miles appeals the District Court’s[1] adverse grant of summary judgment

Page 146

in her employment-discrimination suit. After de novo
review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112
(8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

[1] The Honorable William R. Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Tagged: