LARUE v. DENSO MANUFACTURING ARKANSAS, 367 Fed.Appx. 732 (8th Cir. 2010)

Jodene LARUE, Appellant, v. DENSO MANUFACTURING ARKANSAS, INC., Appellee.

No. 09-3122.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.Submitted: March 15, 2010.
Filed: March 18, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Jodene LaRue, Bismarck, AR, pro se.

Brandon James Harrison, Matthew Scott Jackson, Paul D. Waddell, Barrett Deacon, argued, Jonesboro, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.

Jodene LaRue appeals the district court’s[1] dismissal in part, and adverse grant of summary judgment in part, of her employment-discrimination suit against Denso Manufacturing Arkansas, Inc. (Denso). Upon de novo review, see Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 492 F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2007) (dismissal); Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (summary judgment), we conclude that both the dismissal of LaRue’s age-discrimination claim and the grant of summary judgment to Denso on her remaining claims were proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

[1] The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.