Categories: Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions

JOHNSON v. PORT CITY, 333 Fed.Appx. 145 (8th Cir. 2009)

David JOHNSON, Appellant, v. PORT CITY JANITORS’ SUPPLY PAPER COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 08-2847.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.Submitted: October 5, 2009.
Filed: October 8, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

John Kearney, argued, Pine Bluff, AR, for Appellant.

Spencer F. Robinson, Ramsay Bridg-forth, argued, Pine Bluff, AR, for Appellee.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.

David Johnson appeals following the district court’s[1]
adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.

[1] The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

jdjungle